Adrienna Matzeg’s work often recalls bright summer afternoons, her vibrant table scapes conjuring a lunchtime setting at an alfresco cafe. But her latest series, After Hours, departs from her previous work completely. The punch needle pieces on black linen depict nighttime moments as conjured by memory. The collection, on view at Toronto’s Abbozzo Gallery, is Matzeg’s first physical solo show (she also exhibits her tapestries online). And it draws inspiration from her experiences on a trip to Jeju Island, South Korea and Kyoto, Japan.

It was so hot and humid during the days that Matzeg and her partner could only sightsee in the morning and at night. “I had this crazy vertigo the whole trip. So that’s what defined the night portion of this project,” she explains. “We did more at night because of how uncomfortable it was to go outside during the day.” The two had also purchased a new camera that allowed them to use a film-like setting. The result: dreamy images of cities at night.

When she got home, Matzeg also bought a colour printer; she printed out her photographs, cut them out and pinned them up. Images of a 7-Eleven facade lit up from within, a lantern glowing against a wall and – of course – a portable fan lying prone on an inscrutable surface are just some of the textile depictions she crafted from these images. One of the most evocative is of a taxi heading out into the night. “In Kyoto, the cabs are all these vintage crown comfort Toyotas, and they all have different little emblems on the top for the different companies — like a flower clover. They’re so precious.”

Matzeg sources her cotton threads in France and Japan. The black linen was completely new to her. “What the black linen does is take these scenes from a crazy, busy part of the city and everything else just falls away.” The objects and architectural structures sometimes seem to be floating against the backdrop — Matzeg likes to play with how she positions them on the canvas — the way that “memory comes to the surface, and everything else is just empty space around it,” she explains. “And I think that’s very special.”

For Matzeg, nudging fibre art from the realm of hobby craft is a core consideration. “I intentionally try to elevate the medium in the way that I approach it — in the detail, in the colours that I choose, also how I think about it, which is more like painting.” She’s shaping her scenes by sculpting shapes and carving colours, rather than relying on line work. This means that her architectural themes are uncannily tangible, even if they also feel like flattened snapshots. She’s translating the chrome and plastic surfaces of a karaoke bar facade into thread; she’s blending her loops into smooth gradients. “I think about it more in terms of planes and materials,” Matzeg says.

At the After Hours show at Abbozzo Gallery, the works are installed in shou sugi ban frames (by Superframe) and mounted on an aubergine-painted wall. Together, they appear like a series of windows into vibrant remembered moments — the vivid hues and sharp forms of the scenes popping against their black backgrounds like vivid reliefs. Sometimes, they even gently wrap around the borders of the canvas, blurring the boundaries between object and frame. They’re on show to delight and inspire until May 30.

All photos courtesy Abbozzo Gallery.

The University of Michigan has sent a legal threat over a yearlong pause that would prevent water hookup to a proposed nuclear weapons research and AI data center. Los Alamos National Laboratory and the University of Michigan are looking to build a $1.2 billion, 220,000 square foot data center in Ypsitlanti Township. On April 22, the Ypsilanti Community Utility Authority (YCUA) passed a 365-day moratorium on the delivery of water to hyperscale data centers in the area while it conducted environmental sustainability and long-term water use studies.

As first reported by MLive, the University hand delivered and emailed a legal threat to the YCUA on April 21, the day before it was to vote on the proposed water moratorium. According to a copy of the letter obtained by 404 Media, the university feels the moratorium is “unlawfully discriminatory” against data centers and it promised to pursue “all rights and claims for relief” if its demands weren’t met.

Luther Blackburn, YCUA’s executive director, told 404 Media that the organization had no comment on potential or pending litigation, but did confirm that he’d received a legal communication from the university.  “YCUA staff are working on a Request for Proposal to complete the investigations and studies outlined in the moratorium,” he said. “I believe YCUA has acted lawfully and in accordance with industry best practices by issuing the moratorium.”

The university disagreed. “The University objects to any such sector-specific moratorium which would be legally invalid because, among other defects, it would be unrelated to any documented utility or public health needs,” the letter said, according to a copy obtained by 404 Media. “As a threshold matter, a moratorium on utility service is permissible only when linked to legitimate utility considerations such as documented capacity constraints, public health issues, or genuine financing challenges.”

The University argued, citing various legal precedents, that the courts will not be on Ypsilanti’s  side and claimed that the area has plenty of water. “The record contains no evidence supporting any such YCUA capacity constraint,” the letter said. “To the contrary, YCUA’s leadership has publicly stated that serving the University’s proposed facility would not affect the authority’s ability to provide or treat water.”

The letter quoted Blackburn as saying he had confirmed in 2025 that the data center’s proposed use of 200,000 gallons a day were within YCUA’s 8-10 million gallon per day capacity. “In addition, YCUA leadership has stated that serving the University's project would likely help mitigate overall utility costs by improving efficiency and cost distribution,” the letter said.

Sean Knapp, the YCUA’s director of service operations, told Planet Detroit last year that the YCUA is operating below capacity at the moment. “Adding the data center as a customer would help mitigate overall costs by improving efficiency and cost distribution,” he said at the time.

After saying it was illegal for the Ypsilanti community to not give it water, the University claimed the moratorium discriminated against data centers. “Beyond the above legal deficiencies, the proposed moratorium is pretextual and unlawfully discriminatory because it singles out ‘data centers’ by label rather than by utility impact,” the letter said. “It is discriminatory to permit other users to connect and consume currently available capacity while the utility conducts undefined studies to determine whether there is sufficient capacity for the University’s proposed facility.”

The University then asked the YCUA not to pass a moratorium and promised to “pursue” the matter. “The University respectfully requests that YCUA refuse to issue any sector-specific moratorium, instead basing any service decisions on documented utility factors, applied evenhandedly through existing permitting and technical review processes,” the letter said. “If these legal requirements are not followed by YCUA, the University reserves the right to pursue all rights and claims for necessary relief.”

The University of Michigan did not return 404 Media’s request for comment.

Ypsilanti Township has been fighting the proposed datacenter for more than a year now. Data centers are wildly unpopular in the United States. They often cause noise pollution, affect water quality, and drive up utility bills for their neighbors. Local opposition to the Ypsilanti Township data center has been compounded by its connection to America’s nuclear weapons industry.

Eine Dokumentation aus einer Zeit, in der elektronische Musik noch Neuland war.

This documentary explores the evolution of music in the technological age, focusing on how electronic synthesizers and computers have revolutionized sound creation. The narrator explains that electronic music offers composers unprecedented creative freedom, allowing them to produce complex rhythms, unique pitches, and innovative sound qualities that traditional instruments cannot replicate. By manipulating fundamental elements such as waveforms, envelopes, and filters, musicians can synthesize entirely new textures or imitate natural and traditional sounds. Ultimately, the film highlights how electronic equipment and computer-assisted composition serve as powerful tools, acting as a bridge between the precision of technology and the artistic vision of the composer.

(Direktlink)

Thursday afternoon, millions of students at thousands of universities and K-12 schools were locked out of Canvas, a piece of catch-all education technology software that has become the de facto core of many classes. ShinyHunters, a ransomware group, hacked Canvas’s parent company and apparently stole “billions” of messages and accessed more than 275 million individuals’ data, according to the hacking group. The group also locked students out of Canvas. 

Later Thursday, Instructure, which makes Canvas, was able to mostly put Canvas back online; it is not clear if the company paid a ransom or not. The breach demonstrates the danger in centralizing the educational and personal data of millions of students in a single service. Canvas is essentially a portal where teachers post assignments and lectures, have discussion boards, and students can message with each other and their teachers and connect with other pieces of education tech software. 

Instructure noted on an incident update page that the stolen data includes “certain personal information of users at affected organizations. That includes names, email addresses, student ID numbers, and messages among Canvas users.” Instructure also noted that it was breached twice—once on April 29 and again on Thursday.

Soon after the hack, I called up Ian Linkletter, a digital librarian specializing in emerging education tech, to talk about the implications of the breach. Linkletter has worked in education tech for 20 years and over the last few years has become known for exposing privacy concerns in Proctorio, a remote test proctoring software that rose to prominence during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. Linkletter was sued by Proctorio but eventually the case was dropped.

Linkletter told me the Canvas hack is “the biggest student data privacy disaster in history” in part because of its scale and the sensitive nature of what was stolen. This is my conversation with Linkletter, which has been lightly condensed.

404 Media: What do we know about the hack so far?
Linkletter: At about 1:20 PM [Pacific, Thursday], people started posting screenshots to Reddit of this breach message that they got. Some institutions were cautioning people to change their passwords if they were logged in, right now it just seems like people are in panic mode, some senior administration at schools are in meetings talking about whether they need to cancel finals next week. It’s just the implications are on everything because schools are reliant on this learning management system for everything—communications, grading, finals, everything.

In your email to me, you said you've worked in EdTech for 20 years and you said this is the biggest student data privacy disaster in history. I'm curious what sort of made you frame it that way.
I supported Blackboard [a similar piece of tech] way back in the day and I supported Canvas from about 2017 to 2022 when I worked at the University of British Columbia. And what I was there for when we switched to Canvas in 2017 was the shift from like these scrappy little self-hosted learning management system apps that would be on Canadian servers to this  centralized, all eggs-in-one basket faith in a U.S. tech company. This idea that our data would be just as safe with them as it was when we had it. And because this move to the cloud happened so suddenly about 10 years ago, all of a sudden data got centralized. The only way that I can think of that this type of hack where everything went down, where so much was stolen would be if Instructure had access to everybody's data, which doesn't seem necessary. For it to be just so widespread across every customer is something that, like, [we’ve] never seen before.

Because the contents of messages got leaked, it’s really easy for phishing attacks to get customized. Like, Canvas got hacked [...] and continuing our conversation type of thing, you can get some really personal information from people. And that's also new.

I can also imagine messages between students and teachers to be pretty sensitive.
I supported instructors that used Canvas. And so I would hear these stories like, and they're on like the professor’s subreddit and stuff too, like students are telling you that people died [to explain absences]. There's personal circumstances, medical circumstances, accessibility accommodations, disputes, sexual assault allegations, like all sorts of stuff would be getting reported to the instructor using Canvas. If that information is out across hundreds of millions of people, there's a lot of harm that's going to happen. 

What will you be kind of monitoring as this plays out?
My biggest concern right now is monitoring the institutional response. I feel very strongly that students should have been warned about this like days ago. And it just took this second hack where students got something in their face notifying them that really made schools respond. So I believe that students need to be warned or else they're going to get harmed. And the longer schools wait to tell students about what’s going on, even the little that they know, the more stress and chaos and potential risk to student privacy and safety is at stake.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is exploring developing a pair of smart glasses that would “supplement” the agency’s facial recognition Mobile Fortify application, which lets officers scan someone’s face to verify their citizenship, according to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official. Another person who attended a conference where a senior ICE official spoke about the plans also described them to 404 Media.

The smart glasses, if they came to fruition, would be yet another technological escalation in the Trump administration’s mass deportation campaign. 404 Media previously revealed ICE and Customs Border Protection (CBP) were using the internal app Mobile Fortify to scan peoples’ faces, and instantaneously query a wide range of government databases to decide whether to detain the person or not.  

Matthew Elliston, assistant director of Law Enforcement Systems & Analysis at ICE, said in a meeting the plan to create smartglasses was to “supplement Mobile Fortify,” the DHS official said. 404 Media granted the official anonymity as they weren’t permitted to speak to the press.

Separately, during the 2026 Border Security Expo which took place this week, Elliston was speaking. A participant asked Elliston what technologies the agency was looking for, according to Kenny Morris from the American Friends Service Committee who attended the conference. Elliston’s answer included “wearable heads up displays,” Morris said.

Elliston then said that assaults against ICE officials were up 1400 percent (similar figures have been disputed in press reports), and that smartglasses would let officers be hands-free to respond to any threats, Morris said.

404 Media first heard about ICE’s plan to use smart glasses to supplement Mobile Fortify several months ago from the DHS official. At the time, no written documentation of the plan was available. Last month, independent journalist Ken Klippenstein published a budget document which mentioned DHS’s plan to “deliver innovative hardware, such as operational prototypes of smart glasses, to equip agents with real-time access to information and biometric identification capabilities in the field.” 

404 Media first revealed the existence of Mobile Fortify using leaked ICE emails. It is installed on DHS officials’ work phones, and performs facial recognition on somebody after an ICE official points their phone camera at a person. User manuals for the tool showed the app instantaneously runs a subject’s face against a bank of 200 million images, then pulls up their name, nationality, date of birth, unique identifiers such as their “alien” number, and whether an immigration judge has determined they should be removed from the country. 

404 Media has documented ICE and CBP officials using the smartphone app on American streets, found ICE believes people cannot refuse to be scanned by the app, and that the app misidentified one woman, twice. 

A DHS spokesperson told 404 Media in an email “At this time, no funds have been committed to any form of ‘smart glasses.’”

“The Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) is constantly assessing the needs of ICE and other DHS components to assist law enforcement officers in the field. These discussions involve privacy offices, chief information officers, and attorneys to ensure that any technology that DHS utilizes is within the full scope of the law,” the spokesperson added.

As we’ve reported, CBP officials have been seen multiple times wearing Meta’s Ray-Ban smartglasses during immigration operations. This is despite a ban on personal recording devices. A CBP spokesperson told 404 Media in an email “Recordings may only be done on government sanctioned devices. Officers and agents may wear personally purchased sunglasses.”

Dave Maass, senior investigative researcher at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), told 404 Media that “DHS has been funding research into face-mounted surveillance goggles for quite some time, including Hololens systems designed to help CBP to supposedly ‘see terrorists.’ As the technology advances, it's not surprising that so has DHS's ambitions.” 

“But at worst, we're talking about a technology that invades your privacy if an ICE or CBP officer even looks at you, but even at best, we're looking at a project that, like lots of DHS tech, just wastes taxpayer money on shiny gadgets,” he added.