Resident of the world, traveling the road of life
69484 stories
·
21 followers

These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us

1 Share
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us

Earlier this week, I somewhat stupidly asked our readers to send me examples of "ChatGPT flyers," the AI-generated posters and advertisements that have taken over social media, bulletin boards, restaurant menus, store signage, business cards, and billboards around the world. I say stupidly, because I was flooded with so many terrible, brain-numbing signs for anything you could possibly imagine. I guess I got what I asked for. (Thank you, I love it).

404 Media readers were particularly passionate about their hatred for AI-designed signs. I got some of the best email responses to any story I've done here. Before I get into the AI flyer hall of shame, here's some of what I heard:

"They look like absolute DOG SHIT. Like my cat's litter box! I freaking HATE THEM. I have been posting to my Instagram begging people and businesses to stop using them. No one listens LOL. Thanks for this article. I am glad I'm not screaming into the void by myself."

"thank you for writing this story. I've evangelically shared it with everyone I know, for whatever that's worth. I had never seen a local group churn out an AI-generated flyer before this year, but in the last several months it's gotten out of control. I'm sure you're being inundated with lousy AI flyers. Sorry for adding to the deluge, but this is something that's been bothering me for months."

"This is a great article but also fuck you because you were absolutely right about 'Once you notice a ChatGPT flyer, you will see them everywhere if you keep your eyes open.'"

Without further ado, here are some of the worst flyers we got. This represents just a small sampling of the overall number you sent me. In some cases I've provided more context from the person who sent it to me, and I've biased for ones that appeared in real life (i.e., were printed out) or that are particularly weird. Enjoy!

These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
"Last month I was making one of my regular (miserable) visits to my rural Ohio hometown for care for aging mother. After a very long day cleaning out my childhood home, I thought I had finally snapped and lost my mind when I laid eyes on this table card at the local Mexican joint. "
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
"I do want to warn that I have accidentally poisoned the well around New Haven. I'm a de-facto AI spotter, but it's hard to back up my assertions with vibes."
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
"Use of generative AI in my town proliferated after it was destroyed by the Eaton Fire. This is Altadena, California. Eighteen months later, 2 out of 3 Altadenans are still displaced. Our ongoing challenges with recovery make it difficult to criticize event organizers that habitually use gen AI to create flyers, especially if the events exist to support a community in pain."
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
"my city and our parking authority used to market a public engagement event for a new mural. The city prides itself on a growing Arts District, which is pretty rich since there is no (human) Comms team"
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
This one is good because many of the beer company logos are wrong
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You've Sent Us
Read the whole story
mkalus
44 minutes ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

SURI Reimagines Toothpaste With a Refillable, Displayable System

1 Share

SURI Reimagines Toothpaste With a Refillable, Displayable System

You know the expression, “You can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube.” Except … now you can. SURI, the company behind the eco-friendly sonic toothbrush, just introduced another sustainable option in your dental routine: refillable toothpaste.

Refillable soaps, shampoos, and household cleaners have become increasingly common, but toothpaste has largely remained tied to its single-use tube. SURI’s Restore Gel Refillable Toothpaste—a product two years in the making—attempts to change that.

Three reusable water bottles in white, pastel blue, and pastel green stand upright on a neutral background with shadows cast diagonally across the surface, complementing a minimalist lifestyle alongside essentials like SURI Restore Gel Refillable Toothpaste.

Photography courtesy of SURI.

“We crafted the product experience from the ground up with the user at the center of every design decision, rethinking how people buy, use, and dispose of toothpaste,” explains Seb Wetherall, SURI’s head of innovation.

This meant creating a new product architecture entirely, one designed around the full life cycle of toothpaste. The Restore Gel refillable system is designed to stay on the countertop—or taken on-the-go thanks to a secure lid—and to be used over and over.

The design is anchored by a precision-dosed airless pump made from 50 percent recycled plastic. Made in partnership with Shellworks, the refill bottles are made with Vivomer™, a plant-based home-compostable material. Simply drop a refill into the dispenser, which delivers a precise amount of paste with each pump. Once the bottle is empty, it can return to nature and you can pop a new one in.

A white, cylindrical bottle labeled "SURI Restore Gel Refillable Toothpaste" stands on a surface with a blurred leafy background and condensation on the window.

Photography of SURI.

All together, SURI Restore Gel Refillable Toothpaste reframes toothpaste as a reusable object rather than disposable packaging. “The result is a reusable dispenser designed to feel at home on the bathroom countertop or in a wash bag,” Wetherall explains, “uniting performance, sustainability and considered design in a seamless everyday experience.”

Even if your go-to toothpaste doesn’t get messy with bright blue paste after extended use, it’s likely not an item you want to leave on your curated bathroom counter. SURI’s Restore Gel, on the other hand, is designed to be displayed. It’s available in Sky, Meadow, or Stone, three soft, muted pastels that fit with a variety of wellness-inspired palettes and bathroom styles.

A bottle of SURI Restore Gel Refillable Toothpaste in wild mint flavor stands upright on a light surface, with a blurred bottle in the background.

Photography courtesy of SURI.

The redesign extends beyond the packaging. The Restore Gel formula features high-grade nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HAp), a synthetic calcium phosphate compound that is becoming increasingly popular in oral care products, shown to help strengthen enamel.

You may not be able to put toothpaste back in the (traditional) tube—but you can cut back on your reliance on single-use plastics without compromising. SURI co-founder and CEO Gyve Safavi says that Restore Gel Refillable Toothpaste was created “so you don’t have to choose between a formula that works, a system that looks beautiful on your shelf, and more considered packaging.”

Whether refillable toothpaste becomes the next everyday standard remains to be seen, but SURI makes a compelling case that even one of the bathroom’s most overlooked objects deserves better design.

A light blue, cylindrical bottle with a rounded cap stands upright on a beige surface, casting a shadow. The word "SURI" is printed vertically on the front, subtly hinting at the innovative SURI Restore Gel Refillable Toothpaste contained within.

Photography courtesy of SURI.

SURI Restore Gel Refillable Toothpaste is available to purchase on trysuri.com, starting at $34.99.

Read the whole story
mkalus
46 minutes ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Mixtape: Djanzy – Good Vibes from The Record Shelf

1 Share

Ick wees ja nich, wat bei euch so los is, aber ick für meenen Teil hab hier jetzt drei Wochen Urlaub und die Welt da draußen kann mir derweil mal am Töffel tüten. Womit könnte man dazu passender starten als mit dieser Selektion aus Djanzys Plattenregal? Genau – da fällt mir jetzt gerade auch nicht Besseres ein. Brot backen, Bruschetta machen, am Pool rumlümmeln, paar Kilometer Fahrrad fahren. Hach!

Tracklist:
01 Twit One – Malandragem
02 Blick Bassy – Aké
03 Moses Sumney – Quarrel
04 Fat Freddy’s Drop – Dark Days
05 Bonobo – Second Sun
06 Greg Foat & Ayo Salawu – Interstellar Fantasy
07 Organic Pulse Ensemble – Peace Piece
08 The Cinematic Orchestra – All That You Give (feat. Fontella Bass)
09 Greentea Peng – Meditation
10 OutKast – SpottieOttieDopaliscious
11 Glass Beams – Mirage
12 BADBADNOTGOOD – Take Me With You
13 Matthew Halsall & The Gondwana Orchestra – As I Walk (feat. Josephine Oniyama)
14 Call Sender – Laura
15 Chip Wickham – Falling Deep
16 Pete Philly & Perquisite – Hope (feat. Talib Kweli)

Read the whole story
mkalus
46 minutes ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

NeurIPS conference AI cheats outraged they got caught

1 Share

NeurIPS is an annual machine learning conference. Here in the AI bubble, NeurIPS is huge and flooded with chatbot cash. [Atlantic, archive]

The AI vendors at NeurIPS want to talk about imaginary problems, like the super-AI destroying humanity. The researchers want to get on with doing science.

You want to present your work at NeurIPS. You submit your conference paper. It goes to a reviewer — usually someone else who submitted a paper. They check your paper’s up to standard.

Unfortunately, a lot of reviewers lately are passing the review job to the chatbot. This misses the entire point of peer review. But it sure saves time!

NeurIPS has a clear rule: it flatly forbids reviewers from using the chatbot: [NeurIPS]

Our policy is strict: reviewers may not use any LLMs or AI agents in the review process.

But a few reviewers didn’t listen. And now they’re yelling in august scientific venues such as LinkedIn that they got caught fobbing their work off to a chatbot.

How did they get caught? NeurIPS put chatbot prompts hidden in the PDFs they sent out for review. These told the chatbot to use a particular phrase in the review.

The bros were deeply aggrieved: [Transmitter]

You do not build a healthy reviewing culture by treating your reviewers as suspects.

You don’t build it by fobbing your reviews off to a chatbot, either.

NeurIPS wasn’t the first machine learning conference to do this.The International Conference on Machine Learning did the same thing earlier this year.

ICML actually had two policies for chatbot reviewing. “Policy A” was no chatbots allowed. “Policy B” was: “LLMs allowed to help understand the paper and related works, and polish reviews.” [ICML]

That’s easy, right? But AI bros refuse to understand consent.

So a pile of reviewers signed up for the no chatbots track — and they used chatbots anyway! And they got busted:

795 reviews (~1% of all reviews) written by 506 unique reviewers who were assigned Policy A (no LLMs) were detected to have used LLMs in their review. Again, recall that these are reviewers who explicitly agreed to not use LLMs in their reviews.

… If the designated Reciprocal Reviewer for a submission produced such a review, their submission was rejected.

So the bros who cheated got their own paper kicked out.

How did this go down? Was there a flood of deep concern?

It turns out the AI bros whining on LinkedIn are not the majority. The scientists were largely delighted with the ICML approach:

Researchers expressed “overwhelming support” for the strategy, says Shah, who adds that he shared the methodology with the NeurIPS team. “I have been working on conference peer review for several years, and I have hardly seen such strong support for anything,” he says. “People were really tired of reviewers copy-pasting AI-generated reviews without putting any effort.”

Academic reviews are work — but nobody likes a cheat.

Read the whole story
mkalus
16 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Fushimi Inari Entrance Crowd

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

Fushimi Inari Entrance Crowd

Visitors gather beneath a large red torii gate at the shrine entrance.



Read the whole story
mkalus
2 days ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Tunnel of Torii

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

Tunnel of Torii

Looking upward through dense rows of red torii gates.



Read the whole story
mkalus
2 days ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories