Resident of the world, traveling the road of life
6981 stories
·
12 followers

The Battle Between Trader Joe’s & Pirate Joe’s Rages On

2 Comments

Can you effectively recreate a supermarket by buying a bunch of that store’s products, shipping them across the border and selling them in a store with a deliberately similar name? That’s the question at the center of a years-long legal battle between Trader Joe’s and its Canadian lookalike Pirate Joe’s.

We first wrote about this dispute back in Aug. 2013, when Trader Joe’s filed a lawsuit against Pirate Joe’s, a small Vancouver retailer that re-sold TJ products bought in the U.S. and shipped across the border.

Trader Joe’s argued that this was a case of trademark infringement and dilution that could cause possible confusion and harm to the brand. The Canadian store sells TJ-branded products, but at a substantial markup. Additionally, the U.S.-based chain said its reputation could be indirectly hurt if someone were to fall ill from eating frozen food that was improperly transported.

But the court disagreed, dismissing the lawsuit and ruling that the Lanham Act — the U.S. law that bars abuse of trademarks — does not apply to Pirate Joe’s conduct in Canada because the potential for harm posed by one small Vancouver shop does not merit extraterritorial application of the law.

However, last week the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the lower court’s decision, ruling that TJ’s had indeed met the standard for allowing the company to bring a Lanham Act complaint against the Canadian owner of Pirate Joe’s, and that it didn’t matter that the alleged trademark infringement occurred in another country.

The appeals panel says that the effect on Trader Joe’s need not be substantial for the case to move forward, just “some effect.” This is important here because this effect usually involves foreign goods coming into the U.S. and allegedly harming a trademark. In this case, TJ’s makes no claim that the items sold at Pirate Joe’s are working their way back south of the border.

Nevertheless, argues the retailer, the fact that PJ’s is selling Trader Joe’s branded food at a significantly higher price to people who are familiar with — and may even drive to the U.S. to shop at — Trader Joe’s is sufficient to make the “some effect” claim.

What about the doctrine of “first sale,” which holds that after you buy something you’re pretty much free to do with it as you please? This is why there are used book stores, yard sales, eBay, Craigslist, etc. Why shouldn’t you be able to just resell Trader Joe’s brand food at whatever price you want to charge?

Trader Joe’s contends that unfettered reselling of its products may result in harm to its reputation and reduce the value of its trademarks if, for example, people get sick after eating a resold item, or obtain a substandard product that was harmed during the shipping process.

“There is nothing implausible about the concern that Trader Joe’s will suffer a tarnished reputation and resultant monetary harm in the United States from contaminated goods sold in Canada,” writes the Ninth Circuit. “Incidents of food-born illness regularly make international news, and Trader Joe’s alleges that it is aware of at least one customer who became sick after consuming food sold by Pirate Joe’s. Courts have held that reputational harm to an American plaintiff may constitute ‘some effect’ on American commerce.”

Additionally, there is the similarity of the names of the two stores and Trader Joe’s contention that Pirate Joe’s is attempting to pass itself off as an authorized partner of TJ’s.

If Pirate Joe’s customers mistakenly believe the two retailer’s are linked, the shoppers may incorrectly assume that Trader Joe’s is okay with the higher prices being charged at Pirate Joe’s, notes the ruling. TJ’s also contends that Pirate Joe’s provides a lower quality of customer service, which it says could harm the U.S. retailer’s reputation if shoppers believe the two stores have an official relationship.

“False endorsement gives rise to an actionable harm under the Lanham Act,” notes the court, “and Trader Joe’s contends it will suffer this harm in the United States because it draws international shoppers to its northern-Washington stores, and its trademarks stand to lose value in the United States.”

Finally, while Pirate Joe’s only resells the TJ’s items in Canada, Trader Joe’s alleges that the smaller store is nonetheless doing business in the U.S., by purchasing the food for resale in Washington and also allegedly hiring U.S. citizens to buy food on PJ’s behalf.

“This domestic economic activity weighs in favor of applying the Lanham Act” to Pirate Joe’s, says the court, which overturned the District Court’s 2013 dismissal of the case.

None of this means that Trader Joe’s has won the dispute or will ultimately prevail. The Ninth Circuit ruling only means that the Trader Joe’s lawsuit against Pirate Joe’s has been given new life and can continue to move forward.

A lawyer representing Pirate Joe’s tells the WSJ Law Blog that “We are obviously disagree with, and are disappointed in, the Court’s ruling. We are evaluating the opinion and our options going forward.”





Read the whole story
mkalus
3 hours ago
reply
Unless you're blind and daft there is no way you can mistake (P)irate Joe's with Trader Joe's.
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
gglockner
9 hours ago
reply
Here's a crazy idea: Trader Joe's should open some stores in Canada!
Bellevue, WA

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Teach a Man to Fish

1 Comment and 12 Shares


Hovertext:
In economics, they're robots. In political economy, they're all jerks. In sociology, they're all misunderstood.

New comic!
Today's News:
Read the whole story
mkalus
12 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
pmac
11 hours ago
reply
HAHA... awwww
Atlanta, GA

Wie das mit den Dinosauriern war

1 Share

Oder besser: auch gewesen sein könnte.

Read the whole story
mkalus
1 day ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Kurze Durchsage an Tor-Benutzer. Es gibt gerade einen ...

1 Share
Kurze Durchsage an Tor-Benutzer. Es gibt gerade einen Aufruf für einen "Tor-Generalstreik" am 1. September. Hintergrund sind Zankereien dazu, ob Tor mit Jake Appelbaum ordentlich umgegangen ist, ob die Tor-Führungsriege nicht zurücktreten sollte, ob da nicht zu viele Militär- und Geheimdienstverbindungen bestehen.

Inhaltlich sind das alles diskutierenwerte Punkte, aber ein Generalstreik gegen Tor ist Infrastukturzerstörung. Und zwar nicht nur für einen selbst, sondern für andere.

Tor verspricht Anonymität durch Verstecken im Traffic anderer. Wenn die anderen Tor bestreiken, dann sinkt die Anonymitätsgarantie. Wenn die Infrastruktur-Freiwilligen alle ihre Exit Nodes ausmachen, und nur das Militär ihre weiterlaufen lässt, dann ist Tor-Benutzung am 1. September möglicherweise sogar schlimmer als Surfen ohne Anonymisierung.

Ich verurteile daher diesen Streik, aber kann nur allen Tor-Benutzern raten, am 1. September keine Dinge über Tor zu tun, bei denen von der Anonymität wirklich etwas abhängt. Wer helfen will, kann sich ja vornehmen, mehr Cover-Traffic zu erzeugen durch sinnloses Rumtorrenten oder so, keine Ahnung ob das schlau ist. Aus meiner Sicht haben die Dissidenten auf jeden Fall verloren, wenn ihnen keiner sagt, dass sie am 1. September lieber kein Tor benutzen. Daher erzählt das mal bitte rum.

Wenn das genügend viele Leute mitkriegen, können sie vielleicht den Streik auf einfach absagen und alles wird wieder gut. Ich habe aber wenig Hoffnung. Aus meiner Sicht ist das ein Arschloch-Move erster Güte, dieser Streik. Aus privilegierter Stellung im güldenen Westen "streikt" es sich leicht, klar.

Ich sehe auch keine Chance, dass die Tor-Führungsriege da jetzt ernsthaft über Rücktritt nachdenkt, nur weil so ein Angriff gegen ihre Infrastruktur läuft. Was für eine bescheuerte Idee, echt mal.

Read the whole story
mkalus
1 day ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Ultra Spiritual Yoga Tips

1 Share
From: AwakenWithJP
Duration: 03:54

Ultra Spiritual Yoga Tips
Yogify your bad self with Bad Yogi apparel here: http://bit.ly/2bGQjEN

Claim Your free download of "7 Ways to Be More Spiritual Than Your Friends" at http://AwakenWithJP.com/

Watch more Ultra Spiritual comedy episodes here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kDso5ElFRg&list=PLVqOKx7e2qhefIG5IEGOKQ4pCzFf8IScX

Subscribe to my channel for MORE! New videos every week!: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=awakenwithjp

Connect with me at:
http://www.facebook.com/AwakenWithJP
http://www.Instagram.com/AwakenWithJP
http://www.twitter.com/AwakenWithJP
SnapChat: AwakenWithJP
http://www.AwakenWithJP.com

Because Yoga is an infinitely complex art form, I'll give you tips on how to take your yoga practice to the next level. Bad Yogi helps me help you bring more yogaliness to your yoga.

Read the whole story
mkalus
1 day ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Parenting Regions

5 Shares


Hovertext:
Once we bring in quantum mechanics, all actions are potentially judgeable.

New comic!
Today's News:

GEEKS OF THE BAY AREA!

Submissions for BAHFest West 2016 are open until September 9. This year is an experimental "open theme" show. Getting quality submissions is always the hardest part of the show. So, if you think you've got a neat idea but are worried about sending it in, please do!

(PS: We are also taking early submissions for the forthcoming shows in Boston and London in 2017)

Read the whole story
mkalus
1 day ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories