Resident of the world, traveling the road of life
64502 stories
·
21 followers

SES, or, staring down the dragon

jwz
1 Share
A couple weeks ago Amazon threatened to ban me from sending mail through SES.

tl;dr: After a couple rounds of me saying to them, "WTF are you even talking about", they relented!

This is not the outcome that I in any way expected.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. The changes you made to your email-sending processes have a positive impact [...] You can continue to use SES to send email as you normally would.

The changes I made were: none. They are referring to the none changes that I did not make.

Here's the whole dumb exchange, for those of you who find humor in such idiocy. Double-quoted HTML entities in the are their own; much inspire, very confidence.

We recently performed a manual review of your account's email-sending practices. During our review, we identified characteristics that could cause email providers or anti-spam organizations to classify your messages as spam.

The methods we use to make this decision are proprietary, so unfortunately we can't provide specific details. In general, we only perform manual reviews when our automated systems indicate that an account is sending unsolicited email.

Please review your email-sending practices and procedures to determine the causes of this issue. Common factors that could cause this issue include, but aren't limited to, the following: [...]

Well allow me to retort:

I use SES for two types of emails:

  • Transactional emails in response to purchases;
  • Promotional emails to customers who have opted in for such communication at the time of purchase.

To do so:

  • My server supports SPF, DKIM and DMARC. I have verified that it is configured correctly.
  • Every email contains RFC 8058 List-Unsubscribe headers, as well as clear unsubscribe links in the body of the message. And they work.
  • Bounces are processed. Any address which bounces more than 3 times is never mailed again, unless they re-subscribe.
  • No messages contain broken links.
  • Message bodies contain links only to my own site.
  • Every message is extremely clear about its purpose and content.

In summary, I am following every known customer-email best-practice that there is.

You said:

>> The methods we use to make this decision are proprietary, so unfortunately we can't provide specific details.

Ok, well, WTF am I supposed to do with this? If you won't even tell me what you think the problem is, how am I expected to correct it?

Then some flunky in a call center pasted a reply template:

Your appeal did not provide the information we need to make a decision.

To ensure that your mailing list only contains recipients who want to receive your emails, we recommend that you perform a "permission pass" on your existing lists of email recipients. In a permission pass, you ask your customers to confirm that they still want to receive emails from you. You should then remove all recipients who do not respond from your lists.

It's important that the sender of the email is clear and that your recipients know who is sending them email. If the email is not clearly branded and identifiable as being from the entity that the recipient signed up to get email from, recipients are likely to ignore your mail or mark it as spam. While reviewing your email-sending practices, we noticed that it is hard to tell who your mail is from. It is also recommended to include a disclaimer in your email which provides clarity to the recipients on why they are receiving these mails. SES requires that you clearly align the emails you send with your organization by following the best practices. After you make changes to your mail, please send additional volume with SES so we can ensure you are sending high quality content. For more information, see the following post on the AWS Messaging and Targeting blog:

You should only use Amazon SES to send email to recipients who have signed up and specifically requested to receive email from you. Mail sent to recipients that have not explicitly requested it can be classified by mailbox providers and anti-spam organizations as unwanted sending. Make sure that your mailing list only include addresses of recipients who signed up and agreed to receive your email. For additional information about Amazon SES list management best practices, please see:

Please reply to this message with your answers to the following questions:

-- What changes have you made to your systems or processes? Only include information about changes you have already implemented, not those that you plan to implement in the future.

-- How will these changes prevent similar issues from occurring in the future?

When we receive your response, we will continue to review your case. If we believe the changes you made will prevent this issue from occurring again in the future, we will end the review period for your account.

Thank you for contacting Amazon Web Services.

We value your feedback. Please share your experience by rating this and other correspondences in the AWS Support Center. You can rate a correspondence by selecting the stars in the top right corner of the correspondence.

Well allow me to retort:

To ensure that your mailing list only contains recipients who want to receive your emails, we recommend that you perform a "permission pass" on your existing lists of email recipients. In a permission pass, you ask your customers to confirm that they still want to receive emails from you. You should then remove all recipients who do not respond from your lists.

No, I'm not going to do that. As I said, all of my subscribers have opted in. 100% of them. I have never imported someone else's list or anything like that. These are all my customers, and they all have an unsubscribe button right there. I'm not going to auto-unsubscribe a bunch of them just becuase they happen not to be paying attention this week.

While reviewing your email-sending practices, we noticed that it is hard to tell who your mail is from.

What in the WORLD are you talking about?? Please show me an example of an email from me that you think makes it "hard to tell who the mail is from".

Every message -- every single one -- has a From address of either:

From: DNA Lounge <no-reply@dnalounge.com> or
From: DNA Lounge <orders@dnalounge.com>

Explain to me what is unclear about that. I'll wait.

You should only use Amazon SES to send email to recipients who have signed up and specifically requested to receive email from you.

I am doing this. I have done this. For decades. Why are you wasting my time?

-- What changes have you made to your systems or processes? Only include information about changes you have already implemented, not those that you plan to implement in the future.

None, because nothing is wrong and you're talking nonsense.

-- How will these changes prevent similar issues from occurring in the future?

I cannot predict what nonsense you might talk in the future.

They... relented???

Hello,

We've made a change to the status of your Amazon SES account. These changes are outlined in this message.

NOTE

We only change your sending status in order to protect your reputation as a sender, and to ensure that other SES customers' ability to send email isn't impacted. We may pause your account's ability to send email so that you have time to address these issues. When you fix these issues, we'll restore your account's ability to send email.

IMPORTANT CHANGE IN YOUR SENDING STATUS

You're listed as the primary contact for AWS account [REDACTED]. We placed your SES account in the US West (Oregon) Region under review on 09-11-2024. The review period has ended because you resolved the issue before the end of the review period.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. The changes you made to your email-sending processes have a positive impact on your sender reputation among email providers.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

You can continue to use SES to send email as you normally would. Please keep in place any changes you made during this process. We'll continue to monitor your sending metrics. If we notice additional issues in the future, we may place your account under review or pause your account's ability to send email, in order to protect your reputation as a sender.

Yes, I will definitely keep all none of those changes in place. Thank you for your prompt attention in this matter!

Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.

Read the whole story
mkalus
7 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Neben einer Abwrackprämie sind als Maßnahmen der ...

1 Share
Neben einer Abwrackprämie sind als Maßnahmen der Politik für die Autoindustrie jetzt auch noch im Gespräch: Senken der CO2-Ziele und "Kaufanreize", was auch immer das heißen soll. Ist die Abwrackprämie nicht ein Kaufanreiz?

Eine Sache ist aber nicht auf dem Tisch: Autos bauen, die die Leute kaufen wollen würden. Wie ... die Chinesen. Ein Kleinwagen, ab 8000 Euro, Reichweite bis 330 km.

Ach, sag bloß.

Die deutschen Autobauer bauen ja nur noch Premium-Modelle ab 100k, weil man da so schön Freudenhausprofite machen kann. Und jetzt stellt sich raus, dass die meisten Leute sich gar keine 100k für ein neues Auto leisten können?! Das ist ja unglaublich, Bob!

Klar, da muss der Steuerzahler ran. Leuchtet ein. Der, der sich kein Auto leisten konnte. Der soll jetzt Kaufanreize für die Premium-Karossen zahlen, damit die Reichen reich bleiben können, wenn sie ihren Drittwagen kaufen.

Ich verstehe ja, dass der Habeck unter Druck ist, aber wieso macht der bei diesem Bullshit mit? Der hat doch alles wichtige schon 2019 zu Protokoll gegeben!

"Wenn Sie 2025 kein E-Mobil für unter 20.000 Euro anbieten, dann werden Sie - so fürchte ich - im Markt scheitern."
Ja! Genau so war das abzusehen und genau so ist es gekommen. Lasst sie alle krachend pleite gehen, damit auf ihrer Asche neue Autobauer entstehen können, die Autos bauen, die die Leute kaufen wollen würden. Wenn es nach mir geht, können die alle gar nicht schnell genug pleite gehen!
Read the whole story
mkalus
7 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Art in Public

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

Art in Public



Read the whole story
mkalus
7 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Long Lens

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

Long Lens



Read the whole story
mkalus
7 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Wisst ihr, ich halte ja seit Jahren Vorträge über ...

1 Share
Wisst ihr, ich halte ja seit Jahren Vorträge über IT-Security, wo ich den Leuten sage, dass "wir passen schon auf" und "wird schon nichts passieren" nicht funktioniert.

Ist eigentlich peinlich, dass ich das überhaupt sagen muss. Fällt das außer mir niemandem auf?! Bin ich der einzige, der sieht, dass die Milliarden alle wirkungslos verpuffen und wir immer noch ständig überall von dahingerotzter Ransomware Datenreichtum kriegen?!

Man muss auch dafür sorgen, dass wenn es jemandem gelingt, meinen Prozess zu übernehmen, dass der dann so wenig Zugriff wie möglich hat. Am besten ist er nach dem Angriff genau so weit wie er vor dem Angriff war, von den Zugriffsmöglichkeiten her.

Das ist nicht nur in der IT-Security so. Auch in der Politik ist das so. Wenn du dir Sorgen machst, dass die Nazis die Macht übernehmen könnten, dann musst du vorher dafür sorgen, dass so viele Checks and Balances installiert sind, dass die nichts damit anfangen können, wenn sie es in den Händen haben.

Das ist nun echt keine Raketenchirurgie, aber was tut die Ampel? Das glatte Gegenteil! Dafür sorgen, dass die Nazis einen schlüsselfertigen Überwachungs- und Unterdrückungsstaat in die Hände kriegen, mit mehr Möglichkeiten als jede Diktatur auf deutschem Boden vor ihm.

Zumindest gefühlt auch als die meisten Diktaturen im Ausland. Kennt hier jemand einen Rechtswissenschaftler, der mal eine vergleichende Studie machen möchte? Zwei Vergleiche liegen nahe, finde ich. Erstens: Hat unsere Polizei Befugnisse, die wir in der Vergangenheit Diktaturen vorgeworfen haben? Zweitens: Hat unsere Polizei Befugnisse, die über die der Polizei in notorischen Diktatoren hinausgehen?

Abgesehen davon ist das schon nicht völlig doof, noch schnell die CDU oder die SPD zu wählen. Der Schuldenberg und die Trümmerruine, den die hinterlassen, da kriegen die Nazis 10 Jahre lang keinen Fuß auf den Boden, weil sie erstmal Straßen, Brücken und Gleise renovieren müssen.

Schade nur, dass die in genau die beiden Dinge investiert haben, von denen wir nicht wollen, dass die Nazis sie haben. Armee und Unterdrückungsstaat.

Read the whole story
mkalus
13 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Pluralistic: What the fuck is a PBM? (23 Sep 2024)

1 Comment and 2 Shares


Today's links



A Rube Goldberg machine for feeding a man soup. It has been placed against a background of scattered, assorted pills. In the foreground, along the bottom of the frame, are loosely stacked, bundled US one hundred dollar bills. Beside them stands a miniature caricature of a capitalist, holding a bulging, dollar-sign-emblazoned sack.

What the fuck is a PBM? (permalink)

Terminal-stage capitalism owes its long senescence to its many defensive mechanisms, and it's only by defeating these that we can put it out of its misery. "The Shield of Boringness" is one of the necrocapitalist's most effective defenses, so it behooves us to attack it head-on.

The Shield of Boringness is Dana Claire's extremely useful term for anything so dull that you simply can't hold any conception of it in your mind for any length of time. In the finance sector, they call this "MEGO," which stands for "My Eyes Glaze Over," a term of art for financial arrangements made so performatively complex that only the most exquisitely melted brain-geniuses can hope to unravel their spaghetti logic. The rest of us are meant to simply heft those thick, dense prospectuses in two hands, shrug, and assume, "a pile of shit this big must have a pony under it."

MEGO and its Shield of Boringness are key to all of terminal-stage capitalism's stupidest scams. Cloaking obvious swindles in a lot of complex language and Byzantine payment schemes can make them seem respectable just long enough for the scammers to relieve you of all your inconvenient cash and assets, though, eventually, you're bound to notice that something is missing.

If you spent the years leading up to the Great Financial Crisis baffled by "CDOs," "synthetic CDOs," "ARMs" and other swindler nonsense, you experienced the Shield of Boringness. If you bet your house and/or your retirement savings on these things, you experienced MEGO. If, after the bubble popped, you finally came to understand that these "exotic financial instruments" were just scams, you experienced Stein's Law ("anything that can't go forever eventually stops"). If today you no longer remember what a CDO is, you are once again experiencing the Shield of Boringness.

As bad as 2008 was, it wasn't even close to the end of terminal stage capitalism. The market has soldiered on, with complex swindles like carbon offset trading, metaverse, cryptocurrency, financialized solar installation, and (of course) AI. In addition to these new swindles, we're still playing the hits, finding new ways to make the worst scams of the 2000s even worse.

That brings me to the American health industry, and the absurdly complex, ridiculously corrupt Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), a pathology that has only metastasized since 2008.

On at least 20 separate occasions, I have taken it upon myself to figure out how the PBM swindle works, and nevertheless, every time they come up, I have to go back and figure it out again, because PBMs have the most powerful Shield of Boringness out of the whole Monster Manual of terminal-stage capitalism's trash mobs.

PBMs are back in the news because the FTC is now suing the largest of these for their role in ripping off diabetics with sky-high insulin prices. This has kicked off a fresh round of "what the fuck is a PBM, anyway?" explainers of extremely variable quality. Unsurprisingly, the best of these comes from Matt Stoller:

https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/monopoly-round-up-lina-khan-pharma

Stoller starts by pointing out that Americans have a proud tradition of getting phucked by pharma companies. As far back as the 1950s, Tennessee Senator Estes Kefauver was holding hearings on the scams that pharma companies were using to ensure that Americans paid more for their pills than virtually anyone else in the world.

But since the 2010s, Americans have found themselves paying eye-popping, sky-high, ridiculous drug prices. Eli Lilly's Humolog insulin sold for $21 in 1999; by 2017, the price was $274 – a 1,200% increase! This isn't your grampa's price gouging!

Where do these absurd prices come from? The story starts in the 2000s, when the GW Bush administration encouraged health insurers to create "high deductible" plans, where patients were expected to pay out of pocket for receiving care, until they hit a multi-thousand-dollar threshold, and then their insurance would kick in. Along with "co-pays" and other junk fees, these deductibles were called "cost sharing," and they were sold as a way to prevent the "abuse" of the health care system.

The economists who crafted terminal-stage capitalism's intellectual rationalizations claimed the reason Americans paid so much more for health care than their socialized-medicine using cousins in the rest of the world had nothing to do with the fact that America treats health as a source of profits, while the rest of the world treats health as a human right.

No, the actual root of America's health industry's problems was the moral defects of Americans. Because insured Americans could just go see the doctor whenever they felt like it, they had no incentive to minimize their use of the system. Any time one of these unhinged hypochondriacs got a little sniffle, they could treat themselves to a doctor's visit, enjoying those waiting-room magazines and the pleasure of arranging a sick day with HR, without bearing any of the true costs:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/06/27/the-doctrine-of-moral-hazard/

"Cost sharing" was supposed to create "skin in the game" for every insured American, creating a little pain-point that stung you every time you thought about treating yourself to a luxurious doctor's visit. Now, these payments bit hardest on the poorest workers, because if you're making minimum wage, at $10 co-pay hurts a lot more than it does if you're making six figures. What's more, VPs and the C-suite were offered "gold-plated" plans with low/no deductibles or co-pays, because executives understand the value of a dollar in the way that mere working slobs can't ever hope to comprehend. They can be trusted to only use the doctor when it's truly warranted.

So now you have these high-deductible plans creeping into every workplace. Then along comes Obama and the Affordable Care Act, a compromise that maintains health care as a for-profit enterprise (still not a human right!) but seeks to create universal coverage by requiring every American to buy a plan, requiring insurers to offer plans to every American, and uses public money to subsidize the for-profit health industry to glue it together.

Predictably, the cheapest insurance offered on the Obamacare exchanges – and ultimately, by employers – had sky-high deductibles and co-pays. That way, insurers could pocket a fat public subsidy, offer an "insurance" plan that was cheap enough for even the most marginally employed people to afford, but still offer no coverage until their customers had spent thousands of dollars out-of-pocket in a given year.

That's the background: GWB created high-deductible plans, Obama supercharged them. Keep that in your mind as we go through the MEGO procedures of the PBM sector.

Your insurer has a list of drugs they'll cover, called the "formulary." The formulary also specifies how much the insurance company is willing to pay your pharmacist for these drugs. Creating the formulary and paying pharmacies for dispensing drugs is a lot of tedious work, and insurance outsources this to third parties, called – wait for it – Pharmacy Benefits Managers.

The prices in the formulary the PBM prepares for your insurance company are called the "list prices." These are meant to represent the "sticker price" of the drug, what a pharmacist would charge you if you wandered in off the street with no insurance, but somehow in possession of a valid prescription.

But, as Stoller writes, these "list prices" aren't actually ever charged to anyone. The list price is like the "full price" on the pricetags at a discount furniture place where everything is always "on sale" at 50% off – and whose semi-disposable sofas and balsa-wood dining room chairs are never actually sold at full price.

One theoretical advantage of a PBM is that it can get lower prices because it bargains for all the people in a given insurer's plan. If you're the pharma giant Sanofi and you want your Lantus insulin to be available to any of the people who must use OptumRX's formulary, you have to convince OptumRX to include you in that formulary.

OptumRX – like all PBMs – demands "rebates" from pharma companies if they want to be included in the formulary. On its face, this is similar to the practices of, say, NICE – the UK agency that bargains for medicine on behalf of the NHS, which also bargains with pharma companies for access to everyone in the UK and gets very good deals as a result.

But OptumRX doesn't bargain for a lower list price. They bargain for a bigger rebate. That means that the "price" is still very high, but OptumRX ends up paying a tiny fraction of it, thanks to that rebate. In the OptumRX formulary, Lantus insulin lists for $403. But Sanofi, who make Lantus, rebate $339 of that to OptumRX, leaving just $64 for Lantus.

Here's where the scam hits. Your insurer charges you a deductible based on the list price – $404 – not on the $64 that OptumRX actually pays for your insulin. If you're in a high-deductible plan and you haven't met your cap yet, you're going to pay $404 for your insulin, even though the actual price for it is $64.

Now, you'd think that your insurer would put a stop to this. They chose the PBM, the PBM is ripping off their customers, so it's their job to smack the PBM around and make it cut this shit out. So why would the insurers tolerate this nonsense?

Here's why: the PBMs are divisions of the big health insurance companies." Unitedhealth owns OptumRx; Aetna owns Caremark, and Cigna owns Expressscripts. So it's not the PBM that's ripping you off, it's your own insurance company. They're not just making you pay for drugs that you're supposedly covered for – they're *pocketing the deductible you pay for those drugs.

Now, there's one more entity with power over the PBM that you'd hope would step in on your behalf: your boss. After all, your employer is the entity that actually chooses the insurer and negotiates with them on your behalf. Your boss is in the driver's seat; you're just along for the ride.

It would be pretty funny if the answer to this was that the health insurance company bought your employer, too, and so your boss, the PBM and the insurer were all the same guy, busily swapping hats, paying for a call center full of tormented drones who each have three phones on their desks: one labeled "insurer"; the second, "PBM" and the final one "HR."

But no, the insurers haven't bought out the company you work for (yet). Rather, they've bought off your boss – they're sharing kickbacks with your employer for all the deductibles and co-pays you're being suckered into paying. There's so much money (your money) sloshing around in the PBM scamoverse that anytime someone might get in the way of you being ripped off, they just get cut in for a share of the loot.

That is how the PBM scam works: they're fronts for health insurers who exploit the existence of high-deductible plans in order to get huge kickbacks from pharma makers, and massive fees from you. They split the loot with your boss, whose payout goes up when you get screwed harder.

But wait, there's more! After all, Big Pharma isn't some kind of easily pushed-around weakling. They're big. Why don't they push back against these massive rebates? Because they can afford to pay bribes and smaller companies making cheaper drugs can't. Whether it's a little biotech upstart with a cheaper molecule, or a generics maker who's producing drugs at a fraction of the list price, they just don't have the giant cash reserves it takes to buy their way into the PBMs' formularies. Doubtless, the Big Pharma companies would prefer to pay smaller kickbacks, but from Big Pharma's perspective, the optimum amount of bribes extracted by a PBM isn't zero – far from it. For Big Pharma, the optimal number is one cent higher than "the maximum amount of bribes that a smaller company can afford."

The purpose of a system is what it does. The PBM system makes sure that Americans only have access to the most expensive drugs, and that they pay the highest possible prices for them, and this enriches both insurance companies and employers, while protecting the Big Pharma cartel from upstarts.

Which is why the FTC is suing the PBMs for price-fixing. As Stoller points out, they're using their powers under Section 5 of the FTC Act here, which allows them to shut down "unfair methods of competition":

https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/10/the-courage-to-govern/#whos-in-charge

The case will be adjudicated by an administrative law judge, in a process that's much faster than a federal court case. Once the FTC proves that the PBM scam is illegal when applied to insulin, they'll have a much easier time attacking the scam when it comes to every other drug (the insulin scam has just about run its course, with federally mandated $35 insulin coming online, just as a generation of post-insulin diabetes treatments hit the market).

Obviously the PBMs aren't taking this lying down. Cigna/Expressscripts has actually sued the FTC for libel over the market study it conducted, in which the agency described in pitiless, factual detail how Cigna was ripping us all off. The case is being fought by a low-level Reagan-era monster named Rick Rule, whom Stoller characterizes as a guy who "hangs around in bars and picks up lonely multi-national corporations" (!!).

A scene from the 1996 John Payson movie 'Joe's Apartment' in which cavorting cockroaches do dance numbers around an apartment.

The libel claim is a nonstarter, but it's still wild. It's like one of those movies where they want to show you how bad the cockroaches are, so there's a bit where the exterminator shows up and the roaches form a chorus line and do a kind of Busby Berkeley number:

https://www.46brooklyn.com/news/2024-09-20-the-carlton-report

So here we are: the FTC has set out to euthanize some rentiers, ridding the world of a layer of useless economic middlemen whose sole reason for existing is to make pharmaceuticals as expensive as possible, by colluding with the pharma cartel, the insurance cartel and your boss. This conspiracy exists in plain sight, hidden by the Shield of Boringness. If I've done my job, you now understand how this MEGO scam works – and if you forget all that ten minutes later (as is likely, given the nature of MEGO), that's OK: just remember that this thing is a giant fucking scam, and if you ever need to refresh yourself on the details, you can always re-read this post.

(Image: Flying Logos, CC BY-SA 4.0, modified)


Hey look at this (permalink)



A Wayback Machine banner.

This day in history (permalink)

#20yrsago Lucas put malicious Xbox trojan on Star Wars DVD https://web.archive.org/web/20040925010419/http://www.xbox-scene.com/xbox1data/sep/EpAVlAVpuZDrYOIHtX.php

#20yrsago My Sunburst Award acceptance speech https://memex.craphound.com/2004/09/23/corys-sunburst-acceptance-speech/

#15yrsago London cops finally apologise for mugging geek — four years later https://gizmonaut.net/bits/suspect.html

#15yrsago Lily Allen’s copyright problem https://memex.craphound.com/2009/09/23/lily-allens-copyright-problem/

#15yrsago HOWTO reproduce a key from a distant, angled photo https://web.archive.org/web/20090927024433/http://vision.ucsd.edu/~blaxton/sneakey.html

#15yrsago Photos of Edward Gorey’s house https://www.flickr.com/photos/mychatham/sets/72157604189279962/

#15yrsago AES explained by stick figures https://www.moserware.com/2009/09/stick-figure-guide-to-advanced.html

#15yrsago France adopts law that lets entertainment goons take your family off the net if one member is accused (without evidence) of violating copyright https://www.laquadrature.net/en/2009/09/21/yet-another-adoption-of-liberty-killer-three-strikes-law-in-france/

#10yrsago Lauren Beukes’s Broken Monsters https://memex.craphound.com/2014/09/22/lauren-beukess-broken-monsters/

#10yrsago Photos from Stasiland https://www.wired.com/2014/09/eerie-architecture-east-germanys-secret-police/

#10yrsago Australian PM trades freedom for security, deserves neither https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/the-delicate-balance-between-freedom-and-security-may-have-to-shift-tony-abbott-20140922-10kdz7.html

#10yrsago Cops who use Stingray surveillance must sign company nondisclosure first https://www.muckrock.com/foi/tacoma-72/cell-site-simulator-acquisition-and-use-tacoma-police-department-12243/#1303020-nda_redacted

#10yrsago Scott Westerfeld’s Afterworlds https://memex.craphound.com/2014/09/23/scott-westerfelds-afterworlds/

#5yrsago Bernie Sanders promises to zero out all US medical debt and end medical bankruptciehttps://berniesanders.com/issues/eliminating-medical-debt/s https://berniesanders.com/issues/eliminating-medical-debt/

#5yrsago Towards a “nerdocratic oath” https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=4292

#5yrsago Sarah Pinsker’s “Song for a New Day”: outstanding dystopian rock-and-roll novel of rebellion and redemption https://memex.craphound.com/2019/09/23/sarah-pinskers-song-for-a-new-day-outstanding-dystopian-rock-and-roll-novel-of-rebellion-and-redemption/

#5yrsago The lost audiobooks of Roger Zelazny reading the Chronicles of Amber https://memex.craphound.com/2019/09/22/the-lost-audiobooks-of-roger-zelazny-reading-the-chronicles-of-amber/

#1yrsago Apple fucked us on right to repair (again) https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/22/vin-locking/#thought-differently

#1yrago Down in the (link)dumps https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/23/salmagundi/#dewey-102


Upcoming appearances (permalink)

A photo of me onstage, giving a speech, holding a mic.



A screenshot of me at my desk, doing a livecast.

Recent appearances (permalink)



A grid of my books with Will Stahle covers..

Latest books (permalink)



A cardboard book box with the Macmillan logo.

Upcoming books (permalink)

  • Picks and Shovels: a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about the heroic era of the PC, Tor Books, February 2025

  • Unauthorized Bread: a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, 2025



Colophon (permalink)

Today's top sources:

Currently writing:

  • Enshittification: a nonfiction book about platform decay. Friday's progress: 777 words (52154 words total).

  • A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING

  • Picks and Shovels, a Martin Hench noir thriller about the heroic era of the PC. FORTHCOMING TOR BOOKS JAN 2025

  • Vigilant, Little Brother short story about remote invigilation. FORTHCOMING ON TOR.COM

  • Spill, a Little Brother short story about pipeline protests. FORTHCOMING ON TOR.COM

Latest podcast: Anti-cheat, gamers, and the Crowdstrike disaster https://craphound.com/news/2024/09/15/anti-cheat-gamers-and-the-crowdstrike-disaster/


This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.


How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

Medium (no ads, paywalled):

https://doctorow.medium.com/

Twitter (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://twitter.com/doctorow

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla

Read the whole story
mkalus
13 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
cjheinz
11 hours ago
reply
Terminal-stage capitalism
Lexington, KY; Naples, FL
Next Page of Stories