Resident of the world, traveling the road of life
69249 stories
·
21 followers

Project Lobster: Microsoft brings Copilot AI to OpenClaw

1 Share

OpenClaw is a vibe-coded personal assistant. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella was enraptured with OpenClaw in January: [Information, archive]

Nadella told colleagues he has started testing Clawdbot, an open-source AI product powered by Anthropic models, to automate tasks on a user’s computer … Nadella wrote about how he had used Clawdbot, and he encouraged staff to think about developing similar products.

Jukka Niiranen posted to LinkedIn in February what he thought was an obvious parody of Microsoft’s AI strategy: [LinkedIn]

“Claw” is the new “vibe”. So, you can be sure we’ll see Microsoft introduce this term into its product marketing, one way or another.

… Maybe they could rename Microsoft Agent 365 to Microsoft Claw 365? If Satya isn’t yet ready to declare his org “The Clawpilot Company” just yet.

Nadella said in March that of course Microsoft wouldn’t do an OpenClaw product. Ridiculous idea. Totally insecure: [Investing, archive]

I can’t launch OpenClaw as Microsoft. I mean, it, you know, it just wouldn’t work. I don’t have permission to do that because that would be considered Microsoft launching a virus. I mean, that’s just not a thing. At the same time, it’s a fantastic innovation, right?

Then on 31 March, Omar Shahine, Corporate Vice-President at Microsoft Word, moved sideways to a new position: [LinkedIn]

leading a team building personal assistants for Microsoft 365 customers.

He means putting OpenClaw into Office 365.

Shahine gave his LinkedIn post an illustration of an AI-generated cat holding a Windows flag — the old Microsoft “ninjacat” image — riding a lobster. The lobster also has a cat face. He must have been prompting it wrong.

Microsoft Project Lobster is not yet a product. But it’s an actual team at Microsoft with an official repository on Microsoft’s GitHub project, forked from OpenClaw. [GitHub]

Shahine posted on Wednesday how the Project Lobster team works: [LinkedIn]

I’m personally using ClawPilot every day as my main interface to work. It acts as my personal assistant, signs my messages and Teams chats as “Sebastien,” and I’ve already contributed pull requests fixing bugs and adding features.

With AI, you can have Corporate Vice-President code in your repo. That’s what every developer wants to hear!

How does Shahine control this thing his own CEO called a “virus”? [LinkedIn]

This isn’t a chatbot. It’s a personal agent with an Entra identity, operating securely inside your org, managed by Agent 365.

That’s “securely” in the sense of saying the word “securely” a lot. Also, it’s OpenClaw. I’m confident it’s what you’d expect if you said the words “vibe security.”

The Windows Defender antivirus team had posted in February how OpenClaw was insecure trash. Here’s their advice on how to secure OpenClaw against malicious skill files and prompt injection:  [Microsoft]

Monitor for state or memory manipulation: Regularly review the agent’s saved instructions and state for unexpected persistent rules, newly trusted sources, or changes in behavior across runs.

Shahine wants to put this into your office software at work. Office workers are absolutely not ever going to monitor the health of their OpenClaw bot. So all Shahine needs to do is solve chatbot prompt injection.

Microsoft will fudge the security, because they would love to sell you an AI token guzzler like OpenClaw. You can pay for more and more and more Copilot tokens just to run your personal assistant — remember that GitHub Copilot is moving to token-based pricing by June.

You bet Microsoft wants that pricing model for whatever it calls “Copilot”. This is enterprise SaaS — functioning doesn’t come into the question.

Read the whole story
mkalus
1 hour ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Pluralistic: Ada Palmer's "Inventing the Renaissance" (25 Apr 2026)

1 Share


Today's links



The U Chicago Press cover for Ada Palmer's 'Inventing the Renaissance.'

Ada Palmer's "Inventing the Renaissance" (permalink)

Ada Palmer may just be the most bewilderingly talented person I know: a genius sf writer, incredible librettist and singer, wildly innovative educator, and a leading historian of the Renaissance, and last year, she published her magnum opus, Inventing the Renaissance, a stunning book about so much more than history:

https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/I/bo246135916.html

All of my friends seem to be writing their magnum opuses these days! When (modern) historian Rick Perlstein and I did an event last year for my Enshittification tour, he told me he'd just finished his 1,000 page (ish? I may be misremembering slightly) history of the American conservative movement. And I recently had dinner with China Mieville, who told me he'd just turned in the manuscript for a novel he'd been trying to figure out how to write all his life.

I can't wait to read these books! And I couldn't wait to read Inventing the Renaissance, and I would have been much quicker off the mark but for the exigencies of book tours and books due and so on – but I've been reading it for the past two months or so, and I think I've pitched it about a hundred times to strangers and friends as I savored it, because it's just that good.

Inventing the Renaissance isn't a work of history, it's a work of "historiography" – the study of how histories get written and rewritten. Palmer's point here isn't to make us merely understand the Renaissance – she wants us to understand how the idea of a Renaissance, a rebirth out of a "dark age" into a "golden age" – has been used, abused, created and demolished, for centuries and centuries, including during the centuries when the Renaissance was actually underway.

Palmer teaches Renaissance history at the University of Chicago, where she is legendary for a unique annual pedagogical exercise in which she leads her students through a weeks-long live-action role-playing game that re-enacts the election of the Medicis' Pope. Every student is given a detailed biography of their character's position, goals, proclivities and history, and for weeks, the students scheme, ally, betray and assassinate each other. At the climax, the students take over the university's faux-Gothic cathedral, dressed in Renaissance drag (Palmer has a Google alert for theater companies that are selling off their costumes, and her tiny office at the university overflows with racks of cardinals' robes and other period garb), and they invest a Pope:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/10/17/against-the-great-forces-of-history/

This exercise is nothing short of genius, and the students who experience it often report that it is life-changing. That's because the final candidates are never quite the same, nor are the cardinals who cast votes for the winner. And yet, there are certain bedrocks that never shift, including the fact that Italy is always invaded by some of the factions involved in the election, though which cities burn also changes.

The point of this exercise is to expose the students to the power and limits of both "great historical forces" and the human agency that every one of us has within the envelope defined by those forces. Palmer wants her students to get a bone-deep understanding that while every moment has great forces bearing down on it, that the people of each moment have an enormous amount of leeway to channel the floodwaters that history will unleash. From the servant who bears a message from one great power to another, up to those great powers themselves, each person guides the course of history, even if they can't halt some of its outcomes.

Though Palmer unpacks this exercise and its meaning and results in the final part of her magnum opus, this message about forces and people is really the key to her historiography. She develops these themes in the most charming, accessible manner imaginable, weaving her own journey into history with her accounts of how different eras consciously created and deployed the idea of "the Renaissance" and how these ideas were bolstered, undermined, or ultimately demolished by new evidence. You could not ask for a better account of why there is not, and can never be, a single, canonical "history" of an era or a moment. There will always be multiple histories, overlapping each other, warring with one another, supplanting each other, or being revived as "lost" histories that reveal a truth that "they" have buried.

This is such an ambitious book, and the ambition pays off in so many ways. Take the book's structure: there's a long middle section in which Palmer describes how more than a dozen figures from the Renaissance experienced their era, with many overlapping events and timelines. Palmer's sensitive, beautifully researched and written accounts of the lives of these figures – highborn and lowly, sinister and virtuous – highlights the contradictions of this centuries-long "moment" we call "the Renaissance" and shows us how those contradictions can't ever be resolved, only acknowledged and understood.

This is Palmer the novelist, blending seamlessly with Palmer the historian. Palmer is a close literary – and personal – ally of the equally brilliant sf/fantasy writer Jo Walton, whose work has mined classical and Renaissance history to great effect since she and Palmer struck up their friendship. First, there were Walton's "Philosopher Kings" books, a three-book long thought experiment in which every person of every era who ever dreamed of living in Plato's Republic is brought through time and space to the doomed volcanic island that will someday give rise to the story of Atlantis, to try out Plato's ideal society for real:

https://memex.craphound.com/2015/01/13/jo-waltons-the-just-city/

Then there was Lent, Walton's story of the fanatical reformer Savonarola, who is forced to re-live his life over and over, with breaks in hell where he is tormented by his failure:

https://web.archive.org/web/20190516170659/https://www.latimes.com/books/la-ca-jc-review-jo-walton-lent-20190516-story.html

And this June, she'll bring out Everybody's Perfect, a novel that uses Palmer's trick of telling a story from many viewpoint characters, each of whom perceives the events so differently that their versions can't really be reconciled, except by understanding that there is no one history and there cannot be one history. There are only the histories, ever changing. The omnipotent third person narrator is a lie. I don't know if Palmer got this idea from Walton, or if Walton was inspired by Palmer, but it is a wonderful living example of how intellectual and creative movements (like those that are attributed to the Renaissance) feed one another.

One of Palmer's areas of specialty is free speech and censorship. Along with Adrian Johns, we co-taught a grad seminar called "Censorship, Information Control, and Information Revolutions from Printing Press to Internet" that connected Ada's work to the current battles over online speech:

https://neubauercollegium.uchicago.edu/research/censorship-information-control-and-information-revolutions-from-printing-press-to-internet

Palmer wants us to understand that the majority of censorship is self-censorship – that the Inquisition could only intervene in a tiny minority of cases of prohibited thought and word, and they had to rely on key people – printers, for example – anticipating the Inquisitors' tastes and limiting their speech without an Inquisitorial edict (if this seems relevant to the Trump administration's "war on woke," then you're clearly paying attention):

https://pluralistic.net/2024/02/22/self-censorship/#hugos

Those correspondences between the deep historical record and our current moment make Inventing the Renaissance extremely important and timely – a book hundreds of years in the making, and bang up to date.


Hey look at this (permalink)



A shelf of leatherbound history books with a gilt-stamped series title, 'The World's Famous Events.'

Object permanence (permalink)

#25yrsago Gloating NYT editorial about the dotcom crash https://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/23/opinion/editorial-observer-after-the-fall-the-new-economy-goes-retro.html

#20yrsago RIAA sues family that doesn’t own a PC https://www.techshout.com/riaa-sues-local-family-without-computer-for-illegal-music-file-sharing/

#15yrsago Righthaven copyright troll loses domain https://web.archive.org/web/20110425035158/http://www.domainnamenews.com/legal-issues/righthavencom-invalid-whois/9232

#15yrsago Steampunk Venetian mask https://bob-basset.livejournal.com/160226.html

#5yrsago John Deere's dismal infosec https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/23/reputation-laundry/#deere-john

#5yrsago Foxconn's Wisconsin death-rattle https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/23/reputation-laundry/#monorail

#5yrsago Laundering torturers' reputations with copyfraud https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/23/reputation-laundry/#dark-ops

#1yrago Sarah Wynn-Williams's 'Careless People' https://pluralistic.net/2025/04/23/zuckerstreisand/#zdgaf


Upcoming appearances (permalink)

A photo of me onstage, giving a speech, pounding the podium.



A screenshot of me at my desk, doing a livecast.

Recent appearances (permalink)



A grid of my books with Will Stahle covers..

Latest books (permalink)



A cardboard book box with the Macmillan logo.

Upcoming books (permalink)

  • "The Reverse-Centaur's Guide to AI," a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/)

  • "Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It" (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2026

  • "The Post-American Internet," a geopolitical sequel of sorts to Enshittification, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027

  • "Unauthorized Bread": a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, 2027

  • "The Memex Method," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027



Colophon (permalink)

Today's top sources:

Currently writing: "The Post-American Internet," a sequel to "Enshittification," about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Third draft completed. Submitted to editor.

  • "The Reverse Centaur's Guide to AI," a short book for Farrar, Straus and Giroux about being an effective AI critic. LEGAL REVIEW AND COPYEDIT COMPLETE.

  • "The Post-American Internet," a short book about internet policy in the age of Trumpism. PLANNING.

  • A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING


This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.


How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection):

https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net

Medium (no ads, paywalled):

https://doctorow.medium.com/

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla

READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.

ISSN: 3066-764X

Read the whole story
mkalus
2 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Group Photo before the ride

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

Group Photo before the ride



Read the whole story
mkalus
17 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Erik

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

Erik



Read the whole story
mkalus
17 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Louis

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

Louis



Read the whole story
mkalus
17 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Cass

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

Cass



Read the whole story
mkalus
17 hours ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories