Resident of the world, traveling the road of life
68581 stories
·
21 followers

33 Concepts That May Help One Understand Housing Markets (and Vancouver RE In Particular)

1 Share

All the best for the festive season, and best wishes & good health for 2026 to all readers. Thoughts on the following will be appreciated. – vreaa

1. A home is simply a place to live

A home is first and foremost a place to live – that is its core purpose and ultimately its real value.

2. A home is a basic human need

It’s odd that a society obsessed with the importance of human needs such as clean air, water, food, childcare, education, and healthcare can allow a similarly basic and important human need – shelter – to become a speculative vehicle, for decades.

3. You can calculate the fair financial cost of a home

Housing’s fundamental fair-value pricing can be calculated from historical ratios of (i) local wages and (ii) rental yields. By those measures, and even taking into account recent price weakness, Vancouver homes of all types remain among the most overvalued globally, and can be argued to be roughly two to three times overpriced.

4. Some people will pay a bit more for the benefits of ownership

People may be prepared to pay for the convenience and (in some cases) pride of owning over renting, but this usually modest ‘ownership premium’ does not alone result in prices that are wildly higher than fundamentals justify.

5. Commonplace use of extreme leverage is unique to the housing market

Leverage – borrowing heavily to buy – is routine in housing. The 10-to-one or even 20-to-one leverage that is common in RE (10% down or 5% down respectively) is justifiably seen as cowboy-level risk taking in other markets. Try getting that kind of basic leverage in a margin stock account. RE is the only way in which most citizens are exposed to leveraged investing. And it works seemingly magically on the way up … a young couple’s entire net-worth may double in a year where housing prices leap 5% or 10%. But on the way down, leverage is hellish. This large leverage/deleverage phenomenon is a central factor fuelling both the virtuous and vicious stages of a bubble.

6. Unusual housing tax incentives tempt and drive buyers

Tax-free capital gains on principal residences create big incentives to buy at any cost. In a social system that aims to tax fairly across the board, why fuel speculation in homes by tempting buyers with the promise of this massive reward? And the rewards are indeed outsized – in recent years, in many parts of Vancouver, millions of dollars tax free. How long does it take an average Canadian household to save a million dollars, after tax? A life time? A fairer system might only shield long-term gains that match core inflation.

7. Mortgages stimulate an economy in a profound and unearned fashion

Where do mortgages come from? Answer: Banks create them out of thin air through their lending under our fractional banking system. Most people, even those amongst the most educated members of our society, are unaware of this fact. Test this by asking some of your friends. Most believe mortgages come from other people’s savings. In actual fact, they are created from almost nothing, in the process essentially expanding the money supply (and, yes, fuelling inflation). This results in an economy looking far better than its fundamentals merit, as a bubble expands. Sellers suddenly have large amounts of money to spend now, that they did not earn in any conventional sense. Of course, on the other end of the deal a buyer has promised to pay all this back, but that’s in the future.

8. Decades of unusually low interest rates misprice risk and encourage speculation

Artificially low interest rates since the late 1990s – thanks to celebrity central bankers egged on by eager politicians – made borrowing cheap and fuelled endless price growth. The cost of borrowing was mispriced; citizens could borrow and risk the capital without proportionate consequences. We experienced serial asset bubbles (tech, US housing, everything, AI). Interest rates are still low by historical standards, even though many are complaining that they are ‘too high’ compared with record lows of recent years. The current 5 year rate is ball-park 4%; the average 5 year rate from the 1950s to the present is about 8%.

9. A Speculative Mania

Speculation means buying largely for price appreciation, rather than primarily for income or use. Rising prices draw in more buyers, FOMO kicks in, ‘animal spirits’ take over, and pretty much everyone is dragged into the vortex. We have long maintained that everybody buying in Vancouver, over the last 20 years or so, was doing so with the conscious or unconscious expectation of continuous unrealistic price gains. This applies equally to buyers who argued that they were simply buying for use – the truth is that they would never have contemplated buying at mania prices if they thought that prices may stay flat, or (unimaginably) decrease. They bought based on the assumption of price gains. This local-buyer speculative component was a powerful force driving the market.

10. Stories that Fuelled the Vancouver Bubble

“We are running-out-of-land”, “we are the best-place-on-earth”, “rich foreigners will buy everything”, “endless immigration”. These themes in various combinations were touted widely as reasons for the astronomic prices, and reasons to expect prices to rise indefinitely. Some actual effects in all of these, but more important was the way that these narratives drove relentless buying/speculation by locals. 

11. Serial undeserved and unnecessary bailouts

Vancouver RE received a bailout-shot-in-the arm in the form of very low interest rates in early 2009, when it didn’t even need it. This resulted in the second booster stage of the bubble. The ridiculously loose money of the COVID pandemic has proven to be the last booster shot, causing the 2021-2022 blowoff. We quipped at that time that all Vancouver RE prices would need to truly go into orbit would be a devastating earthquake. Price corrections thus far appear to have removed the COVID blow-off part of the bubble – but prices are still in the stratosphere.

12. Taking a second job as landlord/property manager in order to buy

Many owners became unintended landlords, buying properties with rental suites just so they could stretch to make the mortgage payments and get into the market. Thus citizens routinely got to use only a fraction of their home, and took on a second part-time job (informal property manager) to be part of all this. Many homes became de facto businesses. Is this really how we choose to live, and to spend our time?

13. Shady borrowing and lending practices further increased price pressures 

One income supporting a series of mortgages. Using equity from one property to leverage the next. Fraudulent income declarations to secure larger loans. Blind-eye to the same from the lenders to compete for business.

14. No intention whatsoever to actually repay the mortgage debt

Market historians will have heard stories from a half century ago, of ‘mortgage burning parties’. This was where home owners got together with friends and celebrated finally paying off their debt. “What losers!”, thought Vancouver speculators of the last 20 years. Didn’t people know that mortgages could simply be rolled over, and finally eclipsed by the massive gains in housing prices when you sold? Why bother to pay down your debt with actual earned money, when your appreciating house value could look after all that for you? [These assumptions, of course, get very rudely destroyed when prices plunge.]

15. There is no shortage of land in Canada, only a shortage of will to use it.

Aliens (both those from other countries and those from other planets) are confused – why does a country with the second largest landmass on the planet, and such a low population density, not take advantage of this useful resource? We are most certainly not ‘running out of land’.

16. Vested interests push up prices and benefit from unaffordability

Politicians with multiple properties, realtors posing as neutral experts, media dependent on developer advertising, vocal elites with massive RE ‘portfolios’, influential boomers dependent on the value of their houses for their retirements, many other examples: all have interest in keeping the market hot and prices high. Don’t expect those in positions of influence to take any real action that may make housing affordable. True affordability would have to mean that prices would fall to the vicinity of fair fundamental value levels. Witness the first public statement by the current Federal Minister of Housing (ex-Vancouver-mayor [2008-2018] Gregor Robertson): not to worry, housing prices will not come down. He happens to own multiple BC properties.

17. Realtors are almost never impartial, and show bullish bias

Realtors earn from transactions, not from getting either the buyer or the seller the best deals. Realtors want volume; and they get the most volume in an optimistic, bullish market. Witness the market pause and reduced sales of 2025. Take any opinion, advice, or forecast from anybody in the RE industry with a grain of salt the size of your head.

18. A Real Estate Bubble causes a vast misallocation of resources 

A housing bubble sucks the oxygen out of other activities in the society. Talent and capital is distracted… and flows into real estate. Professionals, distracted by stories of massive gains, become condo flippers. Youth become roofers for quick cash (and F150s!) instead of studying to become nurses or engineers. Capital is diverted from innovation, industry, manufacturing. The economy becomes overdependent on activity related to RE:  by many calculations this sector swells to over 20% of all of BC’s economic activity.

19. In a bubble everything to do with housing goes up in price, because it can.

Prices increase at higher rates than inflation in construction, renovations, landscaping, yard care, condo maintenance fees, etc. Owners see their property values increase in leaps and bounds, and these expenses seem relatively affordable and appropriate – they are easy to ignore. In a related effect, demand for services increase, and the quality of many housing related goods and services appear to go down

20. Housing invades mental space and defines the culture

A multi-decade housing bubble takes up a massive amount of mental space, both for those ‘in’ or ‘out’ of the market. It starts defining a culture. News anchors declare that they ‘love’ real estate. Social interaction is commonly dominated by talk of housing prices, unrealized profits, renovations. Infatuated owners spend an inordinate amount of money and time caring for or refurbishing their homes, which are now their most important ‘investments’. Renters experience chronic anxiety; they anticipate forever being disenfranchised. Sleep is affected. How much does a society suffer from all of this distraction and unproductive activity? Consider how far this is from the default: “A home is first and foremost a place to live”.

21. Owners and renters become two different classes of citizens, often on generational lines

The bubble divides the society. On paper, there emerges huge wealth inequality. Inter-generational conflict festers. Boomers’ retirement hopes (ridiculously high prices) clash with younger generations’ shot at a normal life (prices at fundamental values). Essentially the boomers are asking the youth to fund their retirements by overextending into RE and taking on massive debt for life. Discouraged young people leave town. Owners hunker down and try to protect their paper gains. Politicians express concern about social consequences with sober frowns, but affordable housing talk remains nothing more than talk.

22. Unintended (and not immediately apparent) consequences

Your family doctor, instead of working until 70 to build their retirement nest-egg, retires comfortably at 56 after cashing out by downsizing their primary residence and selling their large clinic space in 2022. Recall prominent architect Bing Thom’s comment on making more money on his Vancouver home than by working “an entire lifetime”. “This tells you something”, he said.

23. Wealth effect spending further boosts the economy

Owners track the prices of comparable properties, feel rich on paper and spend accordingly. They ignoring the need to save and perhaps even build further debt against their home. This makes the economy look stronger than it actually is.

24. Bubbles always end

They are destined to end once they start. When they do start deflating, participants will invariably look for triggers and reasons. Currently they blame tariffs, land claim uncertainty, immigration slowdowns, the exposure of fraud & money-laundering, youth emigration, etc. All of these factors may contribute to a market slowdown, but they should not distract one from understanding that the underlying structure of a bubble is ultimately unsustainable, and will at some point have to collapse, even without external cause.

25. Timing the top is impossible

The market can stay irrational for a long, long time. At the end of 2009 we predicted that the bubble would pop by 2019… out by an outrageous 6 to 16 years, depending on how you calculate. And, yes, retrospectively it would have been better to have purchased in 2005… or 2001… or 1996… but retrospect is cheap. The second lesson any market participant must learn (after learning about speculative manias) is that one has to learn to get over that ‘coulda-shoulda-woulda’ feeling as painlessly as possible.

26. Vicious cycles then follow; the downward-spiral is self-reinforcing 

Negative equity, forced sales, banks protecting themselves, construction grinding to a halt, jobs vanishing, incomes dropping, rents falling, prices resetting lower; rinse and repeat until all speculation is flushed from the market. When prices are falling, speculators vanish – and a market that has been based almost solely on speculation implodes.

27. Price targets are lower than most can imagine

When big bubbles burst, prices often eventually drop to below fundamental values (over 50%-off from current Vancouver prices). These price targets look impossible to all but dedicated students of market history. Prices revert to the mean. Prices drop to levels supported by fundamentals. Prices drop until all bullish sentiment is completely squeezed out. All manias end like this. In RE it can take many years. We currently have (rare) predictions from industry insiders of price drops for the coming year; of the order of 4% for Vancouver. Four percent is noise, not even a correction. 

28. A market that is suffering the effects of a deflating speculative mania cannot be rescued

A popping bubble involves so many powerful self-reinforcing forces that, once underway, it will simply play itself out. Attempted rescues may alter the course somewhat, but are unlikely to change the ultimate outcome and real-price targets. 

29. On the way down, do not be misled by ‘buyers’ market’ descriptors

Sellers’ and buyers’ markets, in RE agent parlance, are defined by inventory:sales ratios. Currently there has been a surge in inventory and a very large drop in sales – but prices have only modestly softened. Already we have hopeful realtors calling this a ‘buyers’ market’. Do not be fooled – you will hear these calls all the way to the bottom – this indicator will ‘stick to the wall’ all the way down, as panicked sellers pile on the inventory and most buyers sit on their hands (remember: speculators hate falling prices). A true buyers’ market will emerge when prices approximate levels determined by fundamentals.

30. In the aftermath, housing may genuinely become affordable again

Affordable housing? Nothing that a good clean speculative-mania collapse cannot sort out. Once the dust clears (and it will take years), we are likely to go through a period where housing is again priced near fundamental value. This will ultimately be good for the society, and hopefully we will have learned from the entire cycle. The path getting there will be gruesome, however.

31. The human cost of a deflating RE bubble is brutal

Bankruptcies, shattered retirement plans, vanished paper wealth, and a lot of regret. Everybody suffers, in different ways, and at different times. Broadly, bulls can be destroyed in the bust; bears were massively inconvenienced and distressed during the run up. But literally everybody suffers when living in a society weathering a bubble deflation and aftermath. 

32. We should try to discourage speculative manias, especially in basic needs

In the end, this is why everything possible should be done to minimize the risk of market manias in future. Humans will always be vulnerable to ‘animal spirits’ and attracted to get-rich-quick schemes – but we could take measures to ensure that structures within the real estate markets, the financial system, the taxation system, and perhaps even education, deter rather than fuel such manias.  

33. Not so fast… we could be wrong (yet again)

Perhaps Vancouver RE prices will turn on a dime and boost from stratosphere to actual orbit. But, this time, it does seem like something is genuinely ‘broken’. We will see.

– vreaa



Read the whole story
mkalus
26 minutes ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Robin AI: a legal review AI that was humans! And it just went broke

1 Share

Robin AI sells — or sold — “legal tech”: services for lawyers. A lot of senior lawyers just love the chatbot, and Robin is delighted to sell to them. Robin’s flagship product is their Legal Intelligence Platform, a “ Legal AI for Enterprise”: [Robin AI, archive]

Our AI-powered platform reviews, analyses, and finalises contracts in the time it takes to finish this sentence.

Huge if true.

Robin AI was founded in 2019, offering machine-learning to review contracts. The company quickly became known for big promises and aggressive marketing. Richard Robinson, the founder of Robin, was really quite ambitious: [Verge]

Well, we’re building an AI lawyer.

Very huge if true.

Robin’s had about $69 million of investment. They closed a $26 million Series B funding round in January 2024. One thing missing from the press release, though, is what the valuation was. This would also tells you how much of the company Robin had to sell off. [Non-Billable; Robin, 2024, archive]

Robin lost its co-founder and CTO, machine learning researcher James Clough, at the end of 2024.

The end came in late October. Robin failed to close a $50 million funding round and laid off 50 staff — for a total of 100 staff lost this year, and 100 remaining. So Robin’s run out of money, and it’s put bits of itself up for sale. [Sifted, archive]

This was just a few months after making the top 10 in the Sunday Times 100 Tech list. The sort of list that looks at excitement and promotion! And not so much at robustness. [Times, archive]

Last Wednesday, Robin sold its Managed Services Unit to Scissero, another legal tech. [Law360, paywalled]

So what happened to Robin? They talked a big game — but they couldn’t give customers what they wanted. There was lots of customer churn, and there was lots of staff churn.

Robin had quickly moved its AI product from pure machine learning to chatbots when those came along. Here’s that Series B press release again:

Robin AI operates a unique hybrid model that combines the Claude LLM with its own proprietary contract data (from over 2 million contracts) and machine learning techniques to read and understand contracts.

Sounds great! But check this bit. Can you see how Robin worked?

An in-house team of legal professionals, or lawyers-in-the-loop, helps to further refine the model to ensure the highest levels of quality and accuracy.

The “lawyers in the loop” seem, from a lot of reports, to have been a bit load-bearing.

Greg Lambert at the Geeks And Law blog notes some concerning Glassdoor reviews: [blog post]

One reviewer noted the company positioned itself as AI-driven while “in practice most of the work is handled manually by staff.” Another called it their “worst professional experience to date.”

I’ve got those Glassdoor reviews here. This one’s headed “Fake AI, long hours, and no real technology”: [Glassdoor]

The product is marketed as “AI,” but in practice most of the work is handled manually by staff. There is very little genuine automation.

— Employees, including lawyers, rarely use the company’s own software because it is unreliable and inefficient.

— Culture of long working hours to cover the gaps left by poor technology.

— Focus is on sales and image rather than building real, scalable tech.

Here’s the other Glassdoor review: [image, archive]

the “AI” tool was completely unusable in my opinion [extremely slow, full of errors, etc.] It was not the AI tool reviewing these contracts for clients — it was people like me in the Legal & Product team.

You could call that AI with lawyers in the loop. The lawyers doing the work were pretty sure it was just lawyers, covering for an AI that didn’t work.

A magical AI black box but it’s humans doing the work? That’s a time-honoured way to launch your world-changing AI startup. You’ll totally go full AI when you finally get it working. Just a bit more funding!

Read the whole story
mkalus
45 minutes ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

John (B&W)

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

John (B&W)



Read the whole story
mkalus
50 minutes ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Simran (B&W)

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

Simran (B&W)



Read the whole story
mkalus
50 minutes ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Looking towards the West End

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

Looking towards the West End



Read the whole story
mkalus
50 minutes ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete

Thrown on the beach

1 Share

Michael Kalus posted a photo:

Thrown on the beach



Read the whole story
mkalus
50 minutes ago
reply
iPhone: 49.287476,-123.142136
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories