Our good friends the billionaires, and especially the venture capitalists, see journalism only as a channel for promoting their ideas outward. It’s never meant to come back toward them.
But the press keeps talking about them and the things they’re doing. Perhaps we can fix this terrible issue using AI!
Here’s Objection AI — your “AI Judge for Investigating Media Claims”! [press release]
The pitch is that it’s hard for rich guys, er, ordinary people, to hold the press to account for daring to write about them. What if we put the subject’s disputes with an article to a completely neutral and objective adjudicator? Like, say, a chatbot:
Objection, a new technology platform founded by entrepreneur Aron D’Souza and backed by investors including Peter Thiel, has launched with an explicit mandate: to subject the media’s claims to systematic investigation and judgment by artificial intelligence.
… At the center of the platform sits what its creators call an AI tribunal. The tribunal is a ‘jury’ of the latest foundational reasoning models, instructed by a Judicial-Purpose Transformer (JPT).
Objection AI exists so rich guys can spin up quick counter-narratives to any bad press. Assuming they can get anyone to take their chatbot seriously. Grok, is this true?
The money is mostly coming from Peter Thiel and Balaji Srinivasan. Aron D’Souza and Thiel were the team that bankrupted the blog Gawker in 2016. They brag about this in the press release:
The Gawker litigation took ten years and millions of dollars. Objection industrializes this process.
That is: the stated goal of Objection AI is to destroy press outlets they don’t like.
Objection AI claims that it: [Objection AI]
gives everyone a fast, affordable, evidence-based way to dispute statements in the media.
If you want to file a dispute, it’ll cost you $2,000. That’s a lot of money for ordinary people — but it’s very fast and affordable for rich guys. [TechCrunch]
The way Objection AI works is that if you’re a reporter and you want to talk to one of these guys to ask him something, he’ll require you to sign up to arbitration by Objection AI — and be subject to any fines you might be charged by their pet chatbot.
Or you could not do that, because why on earth would you. You can just ask for comment in the standard manner, they demand you accept arbitration to get a quote from them, and you write that they refused to give any sort of normal and reasonable comment on the story. Hard Reset Media put it like this: [Hard Reset]
D’Souza is asking journalists to preemptively agree to the possibility of financial penalties set forth by an AI tribunal and/or the guy who helped bankrupt Gawker — all in exchange for an on-the-record interview with someone who is indicating they are paranoid and hoping to pick a fight.
These guys are rich, powerful, and sort of stupid. The same bunch of guys has long been trying to reinvent journalism from first principles — because, as centres of power, they don’t like adverse news coverage. What if we could neutralise that bit?
Balaji Srinivasan, one of Objection AI’s main backers, has been working on an idea like Objection for several years now.
Balaji’s plan as of 2020 was to do paid voting on facts — on a blockchain! You could pay in crypto to get more confirmations on a given fact!
Or you could use a prediction market to ascertain the facts! Of course, in 2026, we now know the use case for prediction markets is to do insider trading on war crimes.
Balaji was also wowed in 2020 by GPT-3. He thought it was definitely good enough to replace journalists: [Twitter, archive]
Next step is to generate sports reporting from box scores, financial reporting from ticker data, and movie reviews from captions.
As described, Balaji’s bot won’t do finance investigations. These guys would think that’s a feature — because they’re the financiers the stories would be about.
Objection AI is a clear statement of the precise thing the powerful rich guys are afraid of: reporting that stands up to them.
There is no reason for anyone to take Objection AI seriously in any way. These guys don’t understand journalism, because their whole knowledge of journalism is that they hate being the subjects of journalism. But that’s because they’re why journalism exists.










































